WiFi-PAP WiFi Based Prioritized Access Point
Loading...
Files
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Department of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh
Abstract
Internet plays a vital role in every day life activities. There are several ways to
access the internet. Communication is also facilitated through the internet. In-
ternet can be accessed through wired or wireless networks. The basic building
blocks of WLANs is Basic Service Set (BSS). BSS has two types of architecture
namely ad hoc and infrastructure network. Most popular means of internet ac-
cess are WiFi based Wireless LANs where the network is infrastructure network
having an Access Point for the exchange of packets between the main server and
clients or between clients. MAC layer mechanism uses IEEE 802.11 which de nes
Distributed Coordination Function (DCF). DCF employs CSMA/CA with binary
exponential backo . With the advance in technology the mobile devices are up-
graded to incorporate WiFi interfaces so that it supports WiFi hotspots. But the
performance of WiFi hotspots are extremely poor compared to the demand in us-
ing these technologies. The reason being that a single Access Point has to handle
all the downlink
ow to its clients or stations though getting the same opportu-
nity to access the channel by contention with the other stations. In case when the
downlink tra c
ow is greater than the uplink tra c
ow the AP has backlogged
packets and packets are dropped consequently degrading the performance at the
AP. This creates an asymmetric situation at the AP. The objective of our paper
would be to reduce the tra c asymmetry and provide strict fairness to all the
competing stations and the AP. We alter the access method of the AP to remove
the asymmetric condition at the AP. AP will be given higher priority to access
the medium hence when it has some packets to send then AP will send it rst.
Stations would compete normally but due to AP having shorter IFS therefore the
AP gets access much more. In case of a collision it would normally backo as in
CSMA/CA. Our proposed scheme removes asymmetric condition due to the as-
signment of higher priority to the AP therefore no queue build up at the AP. This
also reduces the overall delay during communication and the collision probability
reduced. Our proposed scheme might provide better fairness among AP and the
stations as it contends normally. .
Description
Supervised by
Dr. Muhammad Mahbub Alam,
Associate Professor,
Department of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE),
Islamic University of Technology (IUT).
Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh.
Keywords
Citation
[1] E. Aguilera, J. Casademont, J. Cotrina, and A. Rojas. Perf. , \enhancement of wlan IEEE 802.11 for asymmetric tra c. ", In IEEE PIMRC, 2005. [2] S. Shin and H. Schulzrinne, \Balancing uplink and downlink delay of VoIP tra c in WLANs using Adaptive Priority Control (APC). ", In ACM QShine, 2006. [3] Arpit Gupta?,Jeongki Min?,Injong Rhee, \WiFox: Scaling WiFi Performance for Large Audience Environments.", In CoNEXT , 2012. [4] F. Keceli, I. Inan, and E. Ayanoglu, \Weighted Fair Uplink/Downlink Access Provisioning in IEEE 802.11 e WLANs", In IEEE ICC, 2008. [5] Chih-Heng Ke, Chih-Cheng Wei and Kawuu W. Lin, \A Dynamic and Adap- tive Transmission Scheme for Both Solving Uplink/Downlink Unfairness and Performance Anomaly Problems in a Multi-Rate WLAN", In NSP , 2012. [6] S. Shin and H. Schulzrinne, \Schulzrinne. Balancing uplink and downlink delay of VoIP tra c in WLANs using Adaptive Priority Control (APC) ", In ACM QShine, October,2006. [7] A. Aziz, J. Herzen, R. Merz, S. Shneer, and P. Thiran, \Enhance and ex- plore: an adaptive algorithm to maximize the utility of wireless networks", In MobiCom , 2011. [8] A. Banchs, P.Serrano, and H. Oliver, \An Proportional fair throughput al- location in multirate IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs", In Wireless Networks, 2007. [9] L. B. Jiang and S. C. Liew, \Proportional fairness in wireless LANs and ad hoc networks", In IEEE WCNC, 2005. [10] S.W. Kim, B. Kim, and Y. Fang, \Downlink and uplink resource alloc. In IEEE 802.11 wlanst", IEEE TVT, 2005. 30 Bibliography 31 [11] B. T. Kandula S., Lin K. and K. D. FatVAP, \Aggregating AP Backhaul Capacity to Maximize Throughput", In USENIX NSDI, 2008. [12] N.Nandiraju, H. Gossain, D. Cavalcanti, K. Chowdhury, and D. Agrawal, \Achieving Fairness in Wireless LANs by Enhanced IEEE 802.11 DCF", In IEEE WiMob, 2006. [13] Raghavendra, E. Belding, K. Papagiannaki, and K. Almeroth, \Unwanted link layer tra c in large ieee 802.11 wireless networks. In Mobile Computing", IEEE Transactions on, 9(9):1212-1225, sept.2010. [14] S. Rayanchu, V. Shrivastava, S. Banerjee, and R. Chandra. \Fluid: improving throughputs in enterprise wlans through exible channelization", In Mobicom , 2011. [15] M.Rodrig, C. Reis, R. Mahajan, D. Wetherall and J. Zahorjan. \Measr. based char. of 802.11 in a hotspot setting", In ACM E-WIND, 2005. [16] A. Schulman, D. Levin, and N. Spring. \On the delity of 802.11 packet traces", In PAM, 2008. [17] H. Soroush, P. Gilbert, N. Banerjee, B. Levine, M. Corner, and L. Cox. \Con- current wi- for mobile users: analysis and measurements", In ACM CoNEXT , 2011. [18] G. Tan and J. Guttag. \Time-based fairness improves performance in multi- rate WLANs", In USENIX ATC, 2004. [19] I. Tinnirello and S. Choi \Temporal Fairness Provisioning in Multi-Rate Contention-Based 802.11e WLANs", In IEEE WoWMoM, 2005. [20] Casetti, C. Chiasserini, and C.-F \Improving fairness and throughput for voice tra c in 802.11e EDCA", In PIMRC , 2004.