Design, Fabrication and Performance Study of a Solar Water Desalination (Single Slope Still)
| dc.contributor.author | Kamara, Aakifah Yainkain | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bah, Momodou | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jarjusey, Alimamy | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-11T08:58:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-10-30 | |
| dc.description | Supervised by Prof. Dr. Md. Rezwanul Karim, Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering(MPE), Islamic University of Technology (IUT) Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Mechanical and Production Engineering, 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Access to clean water remains a critical global challenge, particularly in arid and remote regions where conventional desalination systems are costly and energy-intensive. To address this, the present study aims to develop an affordable and sustainable solar desalination unit capable of producing potable water using only solar energy. It is hypothesized that a simple single-slope solar still, optimized through effective thermal insulation, shallow basin design, and proper cover inclination, can significantly improve freshwater yield and overall efficiency. A prototype was designed, fabricated, and experimentally tested at outdoor conditions using a tempered-glass cover, a shallow, black-painted basin, a thermal isolator, a brine drain, and a channel used to collect condensates. The performance was evaluated in terms of temperature distribution, solar energy absorption, and hourly distillate output. The design was to increase thermal retention and evaporation speed based on the literature suggestions regarding the most effective cover angles, shallow water depth, and better insulation. Solar radiation, ambient/basin/glass temperatures, relative humidity, and production of hourly distillate were measured during various test days in August at different levels of irradiance. The daily freshwater yield was found to be at a maximum 1.15 L/day during test days with a maximum thermal efficiency of 39.7% with the highest performance achieved under strong solar irradiance and minimal cloud cover. Incident radiation and operating temperatures were found to have a strong dependence on productivity, and cloud cover and rainfall adversely affected it; the use of an insulation layer and a shallow basin enhanced performance as compared to traditional untreated designs. The modified unit exhibited improved performance with higher efficiency and competitive yield, while preserving a simple design, minimal maintenance, and zero fuel consumption. The findings confirm that a simple, fuel-free, and low-maintenance solar still can effectively provide potable water in resource-limited environments, supporting sustainable development goals related to clean water and renewable energy. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Rosegrant, M. W., & Cai, X. (2002). Global water demand and supply projections. Water International, 27(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060208686990 2. Pourkiaei, S. M., Ahmadi, M. H., Ghazvini, M., Moosavi, S., Pourfayaz, F., Kumar, R., & Chen, L. (2021). Status of direct and indirect solar desalination methods: comprehensive review. The European Physical Journal Plus, 136(5). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01560-3 3. Khalid, S., Shahid, M., Natasha, N., Bibi, I., Sarwar, T., Shah, A. H., & Niazi, N. K. (2018). A Review of Environmental Contamination and Health Risk Assessment of Wastewater Use for Crop Irrigation with a Focus on Low and High-Income Countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5), 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050895 4. Kober, T., Schiffer, H., Densing, M., & Panos, E. (2020). Global energy perspectives to 2060 – WEC’s World Energy Scenarios 2019. Energy Strategy Reviews, 31, 100523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100523 5. Reif, J. H., & Alhalabi, W. (2015). Solar-thermal powered desalination: Its significant challenges and potential. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48, 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.065 6. Chow, V. T. (1979). Water as a world resource. Water International, 4(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508067908685798 7. Fessahaye, A. K., Xie, Y., Hu, Y., Dai, G., Zheng, H., & Teng, W. (2025). Groundwater Over-Extraction: Comprehensive Review of socio-economic impacts and pathways to Sustainable management. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 190–211. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2025.3(2).15 8. Sarker, B., Keya, K. N., Mahir, F. I., Nahiun, K. M., Shahida, S., & Khan, R. A. (2021). Surface and Ground Water Pollution: Causes and Effects of Urbanization and Industrialization in South https://doi.org/10.32861/sr.73.32.41 Asia. Scientific Review, 73, 32–41. 9. Thi, H. T. D., & Tóth, A. J. (2023). Investigation of carbon footprints of three desalination technologies: reverse osmosis (RO), Multi-Stage Flash Distillation (MSF) and Multi Effect Distillation (MED). Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering, 67(1), 41 48. https://doi.org/10.3311/ppch.20901 52 10. Cath, T., Childress, A., & Elimelech, M. (2006). Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of Membrane Science, 281(1–2), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048 11. Gude, V. G., Nirmalakhandan, N., & Deng, S. (2010). Renewable and sustainable approaches for desalination. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 2641 2654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.06.008 12. Shatat, M., Worall, M., & Riffat, S. (2013). Opportunities for solar water desalination worldwide: Review. Sustainable https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.03.004 Cities and Society, 9, 67–80. 13. Delgado, W. R., Beach, T., & Luzzadder‐Beach, S. (2020). Solar desalination: Cases, synthesis, and challenges. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1434 14. Abdallah, S., Badran, O., & Abu-Khader, M. M. (2007). Performance evaluation of a modified design of a single slope solar still. Desalination, 219(1–3), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.05.015 15. Badran, O. (2007). Experimental study of the enhancement parameters on a single slope solar still productivity. Desalination, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.04.022 209(1–3), 136–143. 16. Badran, O. O., & Abu-Khader, M. M. (2006). Evaluating thermal performance of a single slope solar still. Heat and https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-006-0180-0 Mass Transfer, 43(10), 985–995. 17. Tony, M. A., & Nabwey, H. A. (2024). Recent advances in solar still technology for solar water desalination. Applied Water Science, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024 02188-1 18. Chauhan, V. K., Shukla, S. K., Tirkey, J. V., & Rathore, P. K. S. (2020). A comprehensive review of direct solar desalination techniques and its advancements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 284, 124719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124719 19. Sahu, R., & Tiwari, A. C. (2024). Performance enhancement of single slope solar still using nanofluids at different water depth. Desalination and Water Treatment, 317, 100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100046 20. Gnanaraj, S. J. P., & Velmurugan, V. (2019). An experimental study on the efficacy of modifications in enhancing the performance of single basin double slope solar still. Desalination, 467, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.05.015 53 21. Sajid, I., Sarwar, A., Tariq, M., Bakhsh, F. I., Ahmad, S., & Mohamed, A. S. N. (2025). An efficient tangent search based power harnessing algorithm for photovoltaic energy generation system. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 123, 110118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110118 22. Sodha, Nayak, J., Singh, U., & Tiwari, G. (1981). Thermal performance of a solar still. Journal of Energy, 5(6), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48038 23. Geete, A., Kharve, D., Patel, H., Karma, H., Prajapati, A., & Sharma, S. (2020). Comparative exergy and exergy efficiency analyses of fabricated single and double slope solar still plants at Indore: case study. SN Applied Sciences, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2763-7 24. Geete, A., Kharve, D., Patel, H., Karma, H., Prajapati, A., & Sharma, S. (2020). Comparative exergy and exergy efficiency analyses of fabricated single and double slope solar still plants at Indore: case study. SN Applied Sciences, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2763-7 25. Essa, F. A., Abdullah, A., Majdi, H. S., Basem, A., Dhahad, H. A., Omara, Z. M., Mohammed, S. A., Alawee, W. H., Ezzi, A. A., & Yusaf, T. (2022). Parameters Affecting the efficiency of Solar Stills—Recent Review. Sustainability, 14(17), 10668. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710668 26. Sharshir, S., Yang, N., Peng, G., & Kabeel, A. (2016). Factors affecting solar stills productivity and improvement techniques: A detailed review. Applied Thermal Engineering, 100, 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.11.041 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.iutoic-dhaka.edu/handle/123456789/2559 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering(MPE), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh | |
| dc.title | Design, Fabrication and Performance Study of a Solar Water Desalination (Single Slope Still) | |
| dc.type | Technical Report |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
- Name:
- 19 Fulltext_MPE_Design, Fabrication and Performance Study of a Solar Water Desalination (Single Slope Still) - Aakifah Yainkain Kamara 200011157.pdf
- Size:
- 1.89 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
- Name:
- 19 Turnitin Report_ MPE_20001157_PR - Aakifah Yainkain Kamara.pdf
- Size:
- 263.67 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description:
